Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/10/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Ikon
From: jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier)
Date: Sat Oct 2 14:49:57 2004
References: <6.1.2.0.2.20041002231328.02149ec0@mail.screengang.com> <3.0.6.32.20041002170231.007fcab0@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <7744b3a7744ce7.7744ce77744b3a@shaw.ca> <7744b3a7744ce7.7744ce77744b3a@shaw.ca> <3.0.6.32.20041002170231.007fcab0@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <3.0.6.32.20041002171126.00884b80@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <6.1.2.0.2.20041002231328.02149ec0@mail.screengang.com> <3.0.6.32.20041002174256.00889b30@pop.mail.yahoo.ca>
So do I except when using the 24. Then I prefer the 0.58x.
John Collier
On Oct 2, 2004, at 3:42 PM, Dan C wrote:
> By the way, I actually prefer the .72 model, and hindsight tells me
> that I
> was slightly crazy when I bought the .85 model.
Replies:
Reply from phong at doan-ltd.com (Phong) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
In reply to:
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Erwin Put's Take on New Rangefinders)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)