Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Ikon
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Sat Oct 2 14:12:55 2004
References: <3.0.6.32.20041002170231.007fcab0@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <7744b3a7744ce7.7744ce77744b3a@shaw.ca> <7744b3a7744ce7.7744ce77744b3a@shaw.ca> <3.0.6.32.20041002170231.007fcab0@pop.mail.yahoo.ca>
 
I'm perfectly happy with the viewfinder in my M6 (.72).  But that's just
me.   

-dan c.

At 11:05 PM 02-10-04 +0200, Didier Ludwig wrote:
>I would have agreed with you until I have seen the viewfinder
>http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/static/image/2004/09/30/zeiss106.jpg
>
>
>>The new Zeiss Ikon will undoubtedly be priced to be a bargain compared with
>>a comparable new Leica, but..there are many 2nd hand M6s on the market
>>which are in excellent condition and which can be bought for a song.   If I
>>had a yearning for a quality rangefinder camera, I think I'd rather have a
>>used M6 than a new Zeiss Ikon.
>>-dan c.
>
Replies: Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
 In reply to: Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Erwin Put's Take on New Rangefinders)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)