Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Ikon
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Sat Oct 2 14:16:29 2004
References: <3.0.6.32.20041002170231.007fcab0@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <7744b3a7744ce7.7744ce77744b3a@shaw.ca> <7744b3a7744ce7.7744ce77744b3a@shaw.ca> <3.0.6.32.20041002170231.007fcab0@pop.mail.yahoo.ca> <3.0.6.32.20041002171126.00884b80@pop.mail.yahoo.ca>
 
same for me. but thats because we never had looked through a better one 
before...

>I'm perfectly happy with the viewfinder in my M6 (.72).  But that's just
>me.
>-dan c.
>
>At 11:05 PM 02-10-04 +0200, Didier Ludwig wrote:
> >I would have agreed with you until I have seen the viewfinder
> >http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/static/image/2004/09/30/zeiss106.jpg
> >
> >
> >>The new Zeiss Ikon will undoubtedly be priced to be a bargain compared 
> >>with
> >>a comparable new Leica, but..there are many 2nd hand M6s on the market
> >>which are in excellent condition and which can be bought for a song.   
> >>If I
> >>had a yearning for a quality rangefinder camera, I think I'd rather have 
> >>a
> >>used M6 than a new Zeiss Ikon.
> >>-dan c.
Replies: Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
 In reply to: Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)
Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Erwin Put's Take on New Rangefinders)
Message from bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Zeiss Ikon)