Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Digilux 2 @ 1600 :-)
From: jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto)
Date: Sun Sep 5 07:13:54 2004
References: <002a01c4928a$11d1a2b0$87d86c18@ted> <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBKEEBFKAA.phong@doan-ltd.com>

Hi Phong,

It is amazing, so the extra push in BW mode is very adequate or
possible.  I don't see so much loss in it... Did you apply some
filtering also in PS?

JSJ


On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 13:11:35 -0400, Phong <phong@doan-ltd.com> wrote:
> Ted Greant wrote (about underexposing digital shots in low light):
> > So any others out there having a shot at this? And what's your
> > results look like?
> 
> 
> Hi Ted,
> 
> I regularly underexpose by 1 or 1 and half stop in low light,
> and then bring up some details with Photoshop curves:
> Here are some examples, which I have shown before,
> of my "uncle":
> 
> http://www.phongdoan.com/Photography/BacHien/crw_8724.htm
> http://www.phongdoan.com/Photography/BacHien/crw_8647.htm
> 
> - Phong
> 
> NO ARCHIVE
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Leica Digilux 2 @ 1600 :-))