Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG Immunity
From: kitmc at vuelux.com (Kit McChesney | Vuelux)
Date: Tue Aug 24 21:04:11 2004

Oh, I knew what you meant, Adam. I was trying to be funny. Perhaps I wasn't
successful? It was, after all, the end of a day of talking about Leicas
nonstop! :)

Kit
-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+kitmc=vuelux.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+kitmc=vuelux.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Adam
Bridge
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:50 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG Immunity

Clearly you haven't checked out how the FDA determines what chemicals
are harmful. Extremely large quantities are often used which is what I
was attempting to parody.

AB

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:51:13 -0600, Kit McChesney | Vuelux
<kitmc@vuelux.com> wrote:
> If you drank the equivalent of what a gallon of Lagavulin is to a rat,
you'd
> be dead, too! That'd be like drinking a small swimming pool's worth of the
> stuff! :)
> 
> Kit
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] LUG Immunity)