Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] More RD-1 Samples
From: mail at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth)
Date: Sat Jul 24 07:59:39 2004
 
Lack of noise at higher ISO values, real rangefinder viewfinder rather
than electronic, RAW buffer (this is a guess on my part), use of prime
lenses.

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On Behalf
Of Jeffery Smith
Sent: 24 July 2004 15:48
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: RE: [Leica] More RD-1 Samples


You hit that nail on the head. Why pay twice as much for a lensless body
when the Digilux 2 is doing the job just fine?

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
Replies: Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] More RD-1 Samples)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] More RD-1 Samples)
 In reply to: Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] More RD-1 Samples)