Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doug
This is the biggest problem with either of these DSLR's. I guess we've
been spoiled with the SL's and even my R4SP.
gene
|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
| | Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> |
| | Sent by: |
| | lug-bounces+grduprey=rockwellcollins.com@leic|
| | a-users.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 07/20/2004 11:00 AM |
| | Please respond to Leica Users Group |
| | |
|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Nathan's Canon (WAS: PAWS 27 and 28)
|
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
grduprey@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> The Nikon had the bundled zoom lens/body package, a f3.5 I believe, and
the
> Canon had a similar lens. Both were much dimer than the 28-70 f 3.5
Leica
> zoom on my R4SP.
In that case there's no way I could live with either the Nikon or Canon.
Going from the SL to one of those DSLRs would be impossible.
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information