Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Wed Jul 14 08:47:05 2004
References: <BD1AB541.52CB%philippe.orlent@pandora.be>

Philippe Orlent offered:
> No more lab, no more time losses, immediate results on the spot, and a
> quality equal to or higher than analog.<,,

Philippe mon ami,
This is true. However, you left out the worst part about digital.......

One now spends countless hours in front of the computer screen compared to
slide / negative selection on a light table where it takes mere minutes to
edit.

The biggest complaint by stock photography colleagues at Masterfile is the
computer time, even though they say it's wonderful their film/lab costs of
$15 -$20,000 a year are eliminated, they now spend far more time in front of
the screen and a great deal less shooting.

So I suppose like anything there's good, bad and ugly to every new fangled
product.

ted





" <philippe.orlent@pandora.be>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost


> >From the review:
>
> suppose 10 rolls of 220 film a day costing about 15$ each everything
> included = 150$
> suppose 15 days of work per month = 15 x 150 = 2,250$
> so 16,990/2,250= 7,5 months
> so 29990/2250= 13,5 months
>
> So these backs pay themselves back in a relatively short period of time,
if
> you're a professional photographer.
>
>
> I'm afraid the end of the analog era is nearing.
> ---
>
> > From: George Lottermoser <george@imagist.com>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> > Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 18:30:24 -0500
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost
> >
> > Feli di Giorgio7/13/04
> >
> >> "The P20 carries a list price of USD $16,990. The P25 costs $29,990."
> >
> > And let us remember that these are "camera backs" no body, no shutter,
no
> > lens, no meter. Just the digital equivalent of film.
> >
> > Fond regards,
> >
> > G e o r g e   L o t t e r m o s e r,    imagist?
> >
> > <?>Peace<?>   <?>Harmony<?>  <?>Stewardship<?>
> >
> > Presenting effective messages in beautiful ways
> >                                    since 1975
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > web                              <www.imagist.com>
> > eMail                        george@imagist.com
> > voice                              262 241 9375
> > fax                                262 241 9398
> >                     Lotter Moser & Associates
> > 10050 N Port Washington Rd  -  Mequon, WI 53092
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)
In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Reality Check re: Digital vs Film vs Cost)