Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Which twin is the problem child?
From: jkoplen at mindspring.com (Julian Koplen)
Date: Fri Jul 2 09:43:21 2004
References: <MJEOLJDINGGLJDHEDAGJCEKOCIAA.woc2@earthlink.net>

And my wife, who used to work with high risk infants, came across a child
named Layette.  Her mother explained that she received a social agency check
marked "for layette".  Another child was named Placenta.

Julian

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill O'Connell" <woc2@earthlink.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Which twin is the problem child?


then there is Syphilis - SighPhyllis, allegedly came from a pamphlet in my
doctors office.

At 08:41 AM 7/1/2004, you wrote:
>In the 60's when my sister first entered Pediatric nursing, she came home
>one day and mentioned that a woman named her new born twins... Lavoris &
>Clitoris.....!!!
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from woc2 at earthlink.net (Bill O'Connell) ([Leica] Which twin is the problem child?)