Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sure are, especially the small papers. Just about every in house publication has gone to double duty, or in the vernacular of another era the speed up. S. Dimitrov > From: Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> > Organization: Creo > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: 28 Jun 2004 10:49:01 -0700 > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: RE: [Leica] 50mm F1.4 redux, or on the need for speed. > > > >> >> Another factor is the declining standards for published work. Go to a >> magazine stand and really look at the photographs. The really major >> firms still have good solid images, but the second tier images are >> typically poorly done. Even the gray lady tries to make images better >> by over, and I mean really over USMing. > > I have definitely noticed that. As an example, when I recently went down > to the Reagan funeral to take some shots, I noticed several reporters > with digital point-shoots and wondered if their publication was having > them do double duty. > > Feli > >> Don >> dorysrus@mindspring.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information