Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jeeze, Dubya is really causing some people to get snippy, huh? At 11:52 AM 6/10/2004, you wrote: >BD, > >I didn't intend to suggest that the Clintons limited their looting only to >goodies brought in by the immediately preceding administration. So, and damn >this IS getting tortured for a mere, smart-assed observation, if they'd left >Nancy's china in the cabinet (make what you will of "cabinet"), new stuff >wouldn't >be required. > >"Facts?" What facts? I done been gradjuminated from a big-time J-school. I >know that facts are in the biases of the beholder. > >-Chris Lawson > >bdcolen@earthlink.net writes: >Uh, Chris? It was Nancy Reagan who purchased - with whatever funds - the >new White House china. And Reagan followed Carter into the White House, >NOT Clinton. And I doubt you are suggesting that the Carters carried out >the china when they left. If you're going to keep the Clinton attacks >going, at least try to get your "facts" straight. ;-) >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information