Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: FS Noctilux
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Wed Jun 2 23:42:45 2004
References: <BCE39B99.D40C%mark@rabinergroup.com>

In some areas better than the f1, in some areas less good but 1/2 stop 
slower!
Frank

On 2 Jun, 2004, at 22:58, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> On 6/2/04 6:49 AM, "Felix Lopez de Maturana" <fmaturana@euskalnet.net>
> wrote:
>
>>> There were 2 Nikon "normal" F1.2 lenses.... As I remember it, the 50 
>>> F1.2
>> is
>>> a 52 or 55 filter.  The 58 F1.2 Noctilux is a 58 mm lens.  But I 
>>> could be
>>> wrong......
>>>
>>> The lenses were VERY different.
>>
>> In fact there were
>>
>> - Nikkor 50mm f1.2 launched July 1978 with filter thread 52mm
>> - Nikkor 50mm f1.2 AI launched September 1981 same thread only 0.4 
>> oz. less
>> - Nikkor 55mm f1.2 launched December 1965 again 52mm filter thread
>> - Nikkor-S 55mm f1.2 October 1972 NAI, AI, AIS  and NASA versions, 
>> same
>> thread
>> - Noct Nikkor 58mm f1.2 February 1977 again filter thread 52mm 
>> converted to
>> AIS in 1982
>>
>> So all of them have 52mm filter thread but I can ensure you that 
>> excepting
>> the Noct Nikkor with his hand moulded aspheric front glass none can 
>> match
>> the Leica Noctilux. I have not tested the Konica f1,2 or the Pentax 
>> f1.2 but
>> I hope not any surprise so I still believe that Leica Noctilux, with 
>> the
>> Noct Nikkor, are the best available light lenses ever built.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Felix
>>
> Yea but how good was the Noct 1.2? I heard not so good.
>
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Photography
> Portland Oregon
>
>
>
> New-improved
> http://rabinergroup.com/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re: FS Noctilux)