Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] new 50/1.4 M lens
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Thu May 27 19:22:05 2004

True.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Slobodan Dimitrov
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 9:49 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] new 50/1.4 M lens


On the other hand, most Leica owners rarely shoot to the rarified limits
of their optics. S. Dimitrov


> From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 21:33:50 -0400
> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: RE: [Leica] new 50/1.4 M lens
> 
> I have to disagree here. IF someone uses the focal length fairly 
> often, and IF the new lens is going to deliver better contrast, 
> crisper images, and virtually no flare, THEN I can see going for the 
> new lens. Ted is absolutely correct in saying that the new lens is not

> going to make someone a better photographer; it will not turn mundane 
> images into iconic images. But for someone who is already getting 
> outstanding images, in terms of their content and their composition, a

> superior lens MAY just make them better.
> 
> But for the average shooter who even has to think at all before 
> spending $2500 on a non-essential item? It's totally nuts. IMHO. ;-)
> 
> B. D.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf 
> Of Dan Cardish
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 8:59 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] new 50/1.4 M lens
> 
> 
> Ted, I can't believe that any working pro would worry about the 
> differences between the old summilux and the new one, regardless of 
> how much better the
> new one may be.   I'm certain that there are many owners of the old
lens
> besides myself who can attest to the fact that it is perfectly capable

> of delivering professional results.
> 
> I figure the only people who really care about the differences are 
> anal retentive types such as myself who occasionally photograph 
> newspapers stuck
> on the wall.   Yes, at one time I may have been guilty of that....
> 
> oh, in case this isn't obvious, I think I agree with you!   :)
> 
> 
> -dan c.
> 
> ps.....my lens says "Ernst Leitz" on it...I bet the new one won't! 
> That's
> got to be worth something!   ;-)
> 
> At 02:26 PM 27-05-04 -0700, Ted Grant wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>> In my case the hesitancy of jumping to buy a new Leica lens has more 
>> to
> 
>> do with, in this case , the Noctilux captures every damn bit of light

>> image I'm satisfied with. It's never failed me,capturing amazing 
>> moments under the severest of lighting conditions one can imagine.
>> 
>> 
> [snip]
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] new 50/1.4 M lens)