Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]DITTO that full-frame concept. I've had to add a wide-angle lens to my lineup just to cover shots I can't get because of the 1.6 conversion factor. It's still worth it. Lea ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tina Manley" <images@InfoAve.Net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 7:24 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Epson digital, or what? > At 11:39 AM 5/23/2004 -0700, you wrote: > >If I went Canon, I'd probably go for a 10D rather than a Rebel > >(stripped-down features), but the 10D size is a bit bigger than some others. > > > >So that's what I'm thinking about lately. Anybody else who is (or has > >been) in a similar situation, please share. > > > >--Peter Klein > > Peter - > > I had all of the same questions and got a Canon 10D. I don't regret it at > all. One of the deciding factors was that I could use my Leica R lenses on > the Canon with an adapter. They work great and I have the best of both > worlds. I don't really see any reason to go to a larger file size because > the quality is there with the 10D and a larger file size just means more CF > cards and a larger computer; however, I would like to have a digital camera > that gives me full frame 35mm photos (Canon 1DS). I'm just not willing to > pay $8,000 for it!! > > Tina > > > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > > http://www.pdiphotos.com > http://www.workbookstock.com > http://www.newscom.com > http://www.americanphotojournalist.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >