Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] XTOL chart WAS Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT
From: daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Wed May 19 04:33:19 2004
References: <000b01c43d93$46738840$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4>

Kodak quit publishing the times and dilutions for anything other than 1:1.
If you want to see what they used to say (works for me) and can read
charts (film, dilution and temperature) in German ...

http://folk.uio.no/danielr/misc/xtol.pdf

Daniel


On Wed, 19 May 2004, Don Dory wrote:

> Eric:
> At 1:3 I was at 13.5 minutes at 68F. At 1:2 I am at 10 minutes but now
> at 70F. (My basement gets warmer in the spring)  As always, use someone
> else's time with caution as YMMV.
>
> Don
> dorysrus@mindspring.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf
> Of Eric
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:32 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans
> best? -OT
>
> Don:
>
> > why mess with success?
>
> That's been my reason for sticking at 1:3.  :)
>
> What were your times for Neopan 1600 in 1:3 and 1:2?  I might have to
> run a
> batch at 1:2 now.
>
> --
> Eric
> http://canid.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)