Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT
From: dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory)
Date: Wed May 19 04:20:27 2004

Eric:
At 1:3 I was at 13.5 minutes at 68F. At 1:2 I am at 10 minutes but now
at 70F. (My basement gets warmer in the spring)  As always, use someone
else's time with caution as YMMV.

Don
dorysrus@mindspring.com

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf
Of Eric
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 5:32 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans
best? -OT

Don:

> why mess with success?

That's been my reason for sticking at 1:3.  :)

What were your times for Neopan 1600 in 1:3 and 1:2?  I might have to
run a
batch at 1:2 now.

--
Eric
http://canid.com/

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] XTOL chart WAS Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)
Reply from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)
In reply to: Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)