Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jeffery, The 35mm stuff is shot at 640. The medium format was shot at 400 (the picture where I used DD-X). But the light on that day was not very representative. It was very misty and I metered for skin tones. Daniel On Tue, 11 May 2004, Jeffery Smith wrote: > And you shoot at the nominal ISO 400? > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Daniel > Ridings > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 11:26 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: RE: [Leica] B&W Film Latitude > > Jeffery, > > All the 35mm was with Xtol. Week 16 was DD-X. Sorry, no diafine :) > > Daniel > > > On Mon, 10 May 2004, Jeffery Smith wrote: > > > Boy, do I like week 16. Smooth grays that remind me of the late > Verichrome. > > What are you using for development? I just tried Ilfotec DD-X and got > pretty > > dense negs. I hope and pray that you say Diafine. :-) > > > > Jeffery > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org > > [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Daniel > > Ridings > > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:12 PM > > To: Leica Users Group > > Subject: RE: [Leica] B&W Film Latitude > > > > > > Hrumpf!!! > > > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2003/32.html > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2003/38.html > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/16.html > > > > :) > > > > Daniel > > > > On Sun, 9 May 2004, Jeffery Smith wrote: > > > > > Alright Alright! Typo. Maybe that's why nobody uses it. ;-) > > > > > > Jeffery Smith > > > New Orleans, LA > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org > > > [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Paul > > > Hardy Carter > > > Sent: Sunday, May 09, 2004 10:44 AM > > > To: Leica Users Group > > > Subject: Re: [Leica] B&W Film Latitude > > > > > > What is HP4+? I've heard of FP4+, and HP5+, but... > > > > > > P ;-) > > > > > > At 10:36 -0500, 9/5/04, Jeffery Smith wrote: > > > >I stumbled across this web page. > > > > > > > >http://www.robertreeves.com/b&w.htm > > > > > > > >It unofficially confirms what I've notice regarding film latitude > > > >(Pan F...bad; T400CN...good). Confirms what you HP4+ people like > > > >about that film. But I don't know anyone who uses HP4+ > > > > > > > >Jeffery Smith > > > >New Orleans, LA > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >