Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not
From: grduprey at rockwellcollins.com (grduprey@rockwellcollins.com)
Date: Mon May 10 11:07:23 2004




Yes, but the Carl Zeiss lenses made for the Contax are completely made in
Japan, not in Germany.  So there is a huge difference in labor costs.

Gene



|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
|         |           "Felix Lopez de Maturana"                    |
|         |           <fmaturana@euskalnet.net>                    |
|         |           Sent by:                                     |
|         |           lug-bounces+grduprey=rockwellcollins.com@leic|
|         |           a-users.org                                  |
|         |                                                        |
|         |                                                        |
|         |           05/08/2004 05:58 AM                          |
|         |           Please respond to Leica Users Group          |
|         |                                                        |
|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
  >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                         |
  |       To:       <lug@leica-users.org>                                                   |
  |       cc:                                                                               |
  |       Subject:  [Leica] Re: Ten years behind?  I think not                              |
  >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|






>Hi Felix,
>
>Why not post here what you like and/or dislike about the R8?
>
>Regards,
>
>Greg
>

I'll try with pleasure, Greg

Pros

- Without any doubt the outstanding quality of some lenses, everyone has
his
choices, and ,therefore, of the images that the camera produces,
- The quality of the building construction, hoever the quality launching
problems. Mine works flawlessly,
- The simplicity. No hesitation if you are in hurry, you find quick the
dial
you need.
- The finder, due to quality of pentaprism and screen, is clear and
contrasty however has a not neutra color rendition
- The shape that mades easy the handling
- The well designed lever for EV correction without keeping out your eye
from finder
- The small and practical winder

Cons

- Size and weight for a non motorized, non autofocus camera
- Lack of autofocus. I know this is a personal opinion but I'm so used from
my first EOS 620 to point and focus, press the button, memorize and
recompose that I miss this feature.
- The price of lenses. I know that you must pay if you wish the quality but
Car Zeiss lenses are cheaper for the Contax -excepting the biggest teles-
not to speak about Canon/Nikon that if, generally speaking may be behind
they are muvh better in performasnces/prize ratio. In my humble opinion
nothing beats the Contax G performances/price in non reflex cameras and a
combo Aria/Contax lenses in manual focusing. The defeat of Kyocera is a
true
catastrophe. In autofocus t6here are lots for a right choice with lenses
that if not outstanding are fairly good,
- Just oner body?. Why not a choice with something smaller, lighter ? la
Aria in Contax?
- The future. I don't fear about my Canon equipment neither film nor
digital

Kind regards

Felix


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information





Replies: Reply from timatherton at theedge.ca (Tim Atherton) ([Leica] Re: Ten years behind? I think not)