Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Guys, I posted my original message as an expression of remembrance, nothing more, nothing less. I appreciate the replies from Ted, Douglas, Oliver and others. I most definitely did *not* intend to spark a thread about military history of WW2. I did visit the Commonwealth cemetery at Arnhem this morning, it was quite moving (and a nice motorcycle ride to get there). Kind regards, Nathan Don Dory wrote: > > Peter, > What you quoted is the traditional history as it came from the victors. > Relatively recent research in the German Army archives tell a somewhat > different picture. > > First, after Kursk, the German Army was strictly defensive so the Soviet > Army was dominant as you state. However, it was the Soviet tank force > that was decimated, only Tankograd saved that aspect of the war. In > reality, the Allied invasion of Italy caused Hitler to redeploy many > panzer divisions to the newly opened southern front. > > The victors, once the German Army had to defend two fronts, had going > for them the ability to increase the size of their force in spite of > devastating loses. > > I am not sure if anyone will really know how many were lost in the maw > of the Eastern Front, but the traditional number of Soviet casualties > for the brief final push to Berlin are in excess of 300,000. > > Don > dorysrus@mindspring.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf > Of GREG LORENZO > Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 11:37 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] Victory Day > > Nathan Wajsman wrote in part: > > > > - the Russians who lost 20 million people during the war and whose > > stand at Stalingrad was arguably the turning point of the war, > > certainly on the Eastern Front; > > > > Hi Nathan, > > >From a military standpoint Stalingrad cost the German Army in excess of > 20 excellent infantry divisions and revealed the German high command's > inflexibility and inability to accept tactical realities. > > These missing infantry divisions were a major factor behind the > subsequent German defeat at Kursk, in the summer of 1943, which I > believe to have been the true turning point of the war in Europe. At > Kursk, the Soviets largely destroyed Germany's Panzer force. The Soviets > continued to hold the initiative until the end of the war. > > I believe that although the Western Allies helped hasten the end of the > war, the Soviet Union after Kursk simply could not lose and it was just > a matter of time until Germany's utter defeat. > > Regards, > > Greg > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl Mobile: +31 630 868 671 http://www.nathanfoto.com/index.html