Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica sighting in Chicago
From: n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri May 7 23:05:16 2004
References: <000201c432ad$7e789820$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <005b01c432b6$d71f5cd0$87d86c18@ted>

I have found that Leica's name recognition varies a lot across
countries. In Switzerland I was struck by the number of shops in Zurich
that carry Leica--you can walk into any number of places and walk out
with an M7 and several lenses, at least the more common ones like the
35mm and 50mm Summicrons. You would also have paid a ridiculously high
Swiss price, of course. On the other hand, in Copenhagen, a bigger city
than Zurich, there are perhaps 2, maybe 3, places in town where any kind
of Leica can be purchased (at equally ridiculous Danish prices). The
Netherlands seems somewhere in between these two extremes.

I would say in general that Leica has much better brand recognition in
North-Western Europe than anywhere else, which is really not surprising.

Nathan

Ted Grant wrote:
> 
> B. D. said:
> 
> >>>> The bottom line is that most PEOPLE don't know that Leica ever existed,
> > or exists. Since at least the 1970s Leica has been a boutique brand in a
> > WalMart world.....<<<
> 
> Hi B. D.,
> 
> I don't think you could say it any plainer! And it's been going down hill
> ever since, quite possibly to oblivion as we know it today.
> 
> Yep at one time in the photo world "it was THE camera!" Period, no question.
> Unfortunately the company did not evolve with an evolving world and is now
> struggling to save the life boats, let alone the ship that sank some years
> ago.
> 
> If you do not evolve with world changes, time and cameras do not stand still
> for no man nor woman! No matter how good, excellent or wonderful the product
> is, the world demands drive the wheels that allow it survive.
> 
> Leica were ten years behind all other SLR manufactures and to date haven't
> caught up, let alone in the digital manufacturing of a digital camera. Yep
> the digi back is coming? So are twelve blue moons in the southern sky! If it
> works as they claim that's great, yes some folks will buy it, but at what
> cost? It isn't like buying an amazing piece of Leica created glass.
> 
> Their constant wail about a digital "M" style camera being impossible was
> all of a sudden turned around as soon as another manufacturer came up with a
> similar machine. Where they were ten years behind in SLR production it would
> appear they're worse off in the digital world. Unfortunately.
> 
> However, I feel there'll always be those of us who'll use film even along
> with digital. And our choice for film camera will always be a Leica.
> Certainly mine will be...... no matter what kind of digital I have in the
> other hand!
> 
> ted
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

http://www.nathanfoto.com/index.html

In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Leica sighting in Chicago)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Leica sighting in Chicago)