Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ten years behind
From: grduprey at rockwellcollins.com (grduprey@rockwellcollins.com)
Date: Wed May 5 11:21:57 2004




Doug

They are no more uglier than the Canon EOS line, IMHO. :-)

Gene



|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
|         |           "Douglas M. Sharp"                           |
|         |           <DouglasMSharp@netscape.net>                 |
|         |           Sent by:                                     |
|         |           lug-bounces+grduprey=rockwellcollins.com@leic|
|         |           a-users.org                                  |
|         |                                                        |
|         |                                                        |
|         |           05/05/2004 11:25 AM                          |
|         |           Please respond to Leica Users Group          |
|         |                                                        |
|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
  >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                         |
  |       To:       Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>                                 |
  |       cc:                                                                               |
  |       Subject:  [Leica] ten years behind                                                |
  >-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|





Leica, built for the future with yesterdays technology !

On the state of the art as represented by Leica cameras I can only agree
with Ted, but wasn't Leica always the world leader in
high quality optics ? If they hadn't been so pig-headed with their
philosophy of "Leica lenses only for Leica cameras" they
could have made a fortune producing for other mounts. After all the
camera body is only a box for holding the film
and partly governing the amount of light which reaches it, it's the lens
(the German word "Objektiv" is a lot more descriptive)
that does the real work of getting the quality of image  that the
photographer wants. This was admirably proved by the Bessa L,
a lens with a camera on it.

Douglas
BTW  I personally hate the design of the R8 and R9, they may be
ergonomically designed but they look awful.

>
> Ted Grant wrote:
>
>> B. D. said:
>>
>>
>>>>>> The bottom line is that most PEOPLE don't know that Leica ever
>>>>>> existed,
>>>>>
>>>
>>> or exists. Since at least the 1970s Leica has been a boutique brand
>>> in a
>>> WalMart world.....<<<
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Leica were ten years behind all other SLR manufactures and to date
>> haven't
>> caught up, let alone in the digital manufacturing of a digital
>> camera. Yep
>> the digi back is coming? So are twelve blue moons in the southern
>> sky! If it
>> works as they claim that's great, yes some folks will buy it, but at
>> what
>> cost? It isn't like buying an amazing piece of Leica created glass.
>>
>>
>>
>> ted
>>


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] ten years behind)