Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bill: They already have M16's....and they shoot but they don't capture an image! Robert Clark Lancaster, PA bill harting wrote: >Might have been Shannon. > >For investment analysis purposes, the $214 M4 was traded after 32 years of >use toward an M7 (still not sure about that decision) for about $1300. It >didn't owe me anything, I think. We'll see about the M7: I'll only be 92 >when I will be ready to trade that toward an M16. > >bill > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> >To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> >Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 10:07 AM >Subject: RE: [Leica] What would a new M cost in 1964? > > > > >>Ah, those were the days - Amsterdam, Hong Kong, and - damn, what was the >>stop-over airport in Ireland? >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org >>[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of >>bill harting >>Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 10:02 AM >>To: Leica Users Group >>Subject: Re: [Leica] What would a new M cost in 1964? >> >> >>And, at the Amsterdam Airport tax-free shop: >> >>April 2, 1969, Leica M4 $214 American. >> >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "John Collier" <jbcollier@shaw.ca> >>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> >>Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 9:31 AM >>Subject: Re: [Leica] What would a new M cost in 1964? >> >> >> >> >>>From 1961: >>> >>>M3 $297 >>>M3 BP $324 >>>M3 + 50/2 rigid $447 >>>M3 + 50/2 DR with eyes $486 >>> >>>M2S (with self timer) $249 >>>M2S BP $276 >>>M2S + 50/2 rigid $399 >>>M2S + 50/2 DR with eyes $438 >>> >>>50/2 rigid $150 >>>50/2 rigid BP $165 >>>50/2 DR $189 >>> >>>35/2 $174 >>>35/2 (with M3 eyes) $207 >>>35/2 BP $180 >>>35/2 (with M3 eyes) BP $219 >>>35/1.4 $267 >>>35/1.4 (with M3 eyes) $297 >>>35/1.4 BP $280.50 >>>35/1.4 (with M3 eyes) BP $312 >>> >>> >>>John Collier >>> >>>On May 3, 2004, at 12:01 AM, Adam Bridge wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>I'm wondering what a Leica M with 50mm f/2 and 35mm lens would have >>>>cost new in >>>>1964? Close is good. >>>> >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Leica Users Group. >>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >