Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A wise and reasonable approach. I do not begrudge anybody their pleasures. Being considerate about it is gentlemanly. Frank On 12 Apr 2004, at 04:00, Marc James Small wrote: > I have been a pipe smoker for 37 years. I am happy with my vice. > Having > grown up in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, during the High Days of the steel > industry, I have absorbed enough soot and smog to kill me already: > anything I inhale from tobacco fumes has to argue with some REALLY > cargenogenic stuff to make an impression. > > My family is relatively immune from cancer. My folks generally die in > their 80's from terminal nastiness: my own mother passed five months > back > at age 82, loyal to her box of wine and carton of cigarettes a week up > to > the end She had a peaceful heart attack and death over a three hour > time-span. I can only hope that we all pass on as peacefully as she > did. > (My non-drinking and non-smoking father, by comparison, had a stroke > and > lingered on for 11 months in a comatose state, something his worst > enemies > would probably not have wished on him, though Dad was capable of making > some REAL enemies.) > > In the end, genetics does more that anything else in determining > longevity > and, even then, lifespan is a crapshoot. (I am enough of a Christian > not > to fear death but, then, I am enough of a Christian to understand the > virtues of having that finest advocate of all time on my side in > explaining > my sins in the hereafter!) Scions of even the longest-lived of > families > can die young for no explicable reason -- my own sister died of cancer > at > age 31 some 29 years back. Those whose family members die young can > live > long. Still, genetics seem to count for more than anything else. > > Secondary smoke has been shown to not be a real issue save for extreme > conditions: it can be shown, for instance, that twenty working years > of > exposure to a co-worker smoking constantly and sitting within ten feet > may > add to the risk of lung cancer but, other than this, the issue is of no > merit and the Federal Courts readily disposed of the rather dubious EPA > study of the early 1990's. > > At its heart, objections to smoking by the majority who are > non-smokers are > simply a matter of style. Non-smokers do not want to inhale tobacco > while > in public places nor do they wish to do so while in restaurants. So > be it, > and this is a reasonable request. But the merchant is torn in two: > the > majority of those who populate bars are smokers, while the majority of > diners are not. In the end, the owners have sought an absolute ban by > the > government so that they are not forced to make decisions which might > prove > unpopular. > > Obviously, accomodations have to be made. When I am around > non-smokers, I > do not smoke -- in truth, the couple with whom my wife and I are most > likely to go out with are non-smokers and I accede to the majority > rules > without a problem. When I have a visitor who is a non-smoker, I work > with > them for mutual comfort. Common courtesy, we call it in these > hustings. > > And do not forget the salutary effect of nicotine: those of you who > are > former smokers will recall the effect you first felt when you lit up > that > first smoke in the morning. Inhaling nicotine provides a burst of > approximately ten IQ points to the average citizen. Smokers can handle > complex problems more readily than non-smokers as a result. > > In my office, there are two rules of decorum: > > First, do not throw your cigarette or cigar butts on the floor. The > ashtrays are there for a reason. > > Second, please remove your hat on entering this office. > > I have far more trouble enforcing the second than I do the first. I > have > lost one (1) client over twenty-five years because I allowed smoking > in my > office, and so be it. I offer my legal abilities for sale, not my > lifestyle choices. (The small and medium-sized law firms in this area > of > western Virginia are generally non-smoking: the large firms all allow > smoking as their clients, the executives of companies, generally smoke. > Again, go figure.) > > I will die of something, someday. I am not going to greet death > willingly > but there is a time and place when I shall pack it in and go on to the > hereafter. If the current pleasure of smoking brings me to a briefer > end > than a more unhappy existence here would bring, then, so be it: I am > going > to die someday and whether it be today or tomorrow or in fifty years, > there > will come a point at whcih I am to die. I am 54 at the present and can > accept death today, though there are many things I have yet to do -- > those > books on Voigtl?nder, Kilfitt, and Novoflex remain unwritten! -- but > others > can fill in the gaps if my time comes soon. If not, I intend to remain > productive until that point. > > And, yes, as a smoker of Latakia blends, I, too, find most cigarette > odors > blandly offensive. The stuff I smoke clears out entire city blocks and > engenders EPA Red Alerts. > > Marc > > msmall@infionline.net FAX: +540/343-7315 > Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >