Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions
From: jerryleh at pacbell.net (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Mon Mar 29 16:37:27 2004
References: <000901c415d1$b24e2370$1062cf0a@BH01> <007501c415d2$cacb67e0$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <20040330002303.GD12375@panix.com>

Rei

You sure did get a bargain on that lens, didn't you?

Jerry

Rei Shinozuka wrote:

> wow, do we agree on something?
>
> :-)
>
> -rei
>
> On Mar29 16:14, B. D. Colen wrote:
> > Oh blah, blah blah, Buzz -;-) An APO it ain't, but it also ain't no
> > pooch. Heavy, yes, but it makes using a 135 on an M practical with those
> > eyes. And soft? Compared to an APO? Yup. But it's more than good enough
> > for gummint work. In fact, I'd say it's one of the real bargins in Leica
> > lensdom, given that it can be picked up for under $500.
> >
> > B. D.
> > A contrarian to the end. :-)
>
> --
> Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
> Ridgewood, New Jersey
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from buzz at bethhardiman.com (Buzz Hausner) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)