Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions
From: buzz at bethhardiman.com (Buzz Hausner)
Date: Mon Mar 29 13:04:11 2004

The 135mm f/2.8 is the ultimate Leica pooch.  Even with the eyes it
isn't easy to focus and, when it is in focus, you'll notice the image is
a tad soft and lacks good contrast.  The best deal in Leica 135's are
late production 135 f/4.0's.  Exceptionally sharp by anybody's
standards, a wee package when compared to the 2.8, and really quite
inexpensive by Leica measures.  Caveat emptor; framing with any 135 on
an M camera is an art which must be learned from experience.

	Buzz Hausner

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+buzz=bethhardiman.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+buzz=bethhardiman.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Gregory Rubenstein
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 3:45 PM
To: lug@leica-users.org
Subject: [Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions


Group:

Will soon buy an M 135 mm and would like users' 
opinions/comments/anecdotes/cautions about the 3.4 APO and old glass
(such 
as the 2.8). Have read Erwin Puts material, but would like some hands-on

input closer to the photo world I inhabit. Lean toward a new 3.4 simply
'cuz 
I've had wretched luck over the years with anything used; must admit, 
however, that I am tempted by the extra stop and significant price 
differential of the old glass.

On- and off-list user replies welcome.

Thanks.

Greg Rubenstein
gcr910@msn.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN Toolbar - FREE! 
http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)
Reply from graham at geebeephoto.com (Graham Battison) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)
In reply to: Message from gcr910 at msn.com (Gregory Rubenstein) ([Leica] M 135 Opinions/Comments/Anecdotes/Cautions)