Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT Differences in DVD-R Quality
From: Matthew Powell <mlpowell@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 23:51:12 -0600
References: <b08f0eb02622.b02622b08f0e@shaw.ca> <000901c40931$89c5b6e0$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <405369C8.2090905@shaw.ca> <4053EF34.29552C28@chello.nl>

On Mar 13, 2004, at 11:35 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I too investigated this a little when I bought a DVD drive over
> Christmas, but I could not find anything definite on various web sites
> or by asking people. With CDs there is pretty much a consensus that the
> gold ones, like Kodak's, are the best; but with DVDs there is no such
> consensus. So I stick with major brands like Sony or Philips and hope
> for the best.
>
> Nathan

TDK sells one that's "armour-plated" (their term/product name), that's 
supposed to be near-impossible to scratch.

I've never been able to find them at a store to try, though.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jim Laurel <jplaurel@nwlink.com> (Re: [Leica] OT Differences in DVD-R Quality)
In reply to: Message from GREG LORENZO <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> ([Leica] OT Differences in DVD-R Quality)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] OT Differences in DVD-R Quality)
Message from "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] OT Differences in DVD-R Quality)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] OT Differences in DVD-R Quality)