Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/03/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Alternative to Digi2: G5 or C5060?
From: "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 17:08:24 -0800
References: <200402271936.LAA00846@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <404A46E9.2020901@verizon.net> <404A4D84.5030100@wanadoo.nl> <009101c403d1$f1f17d40$f131d742@clearsighjhm83> <404A6752.E5E5DF12@pacbell.net>
> Since when do computer magazines become authorities on the qualities
> of photographic images?
>
> Jerry
That was my reaction when I read the reviews but LUG members seem to have
come to the same conclusions as PC on the two cameras in question.
I subscribe to PC Mag for computer info, but I do read most reviews.
PC rates digital photo equipment on handling, features, and speed of
operations more than image quality.
Joe
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Stan Yoder <vze2myh5@verizon.net> ([Leica] Alternative to Digi2: G5 or C5060?)
Message from Michiel Fokkema <michiel.fokkema@wanadoo.nl> (Re: [Leica] Alternative to Digi2: G5 or C5060?)
Message from "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com> (Re: [Leica] Alternative to Digi2: G5 or C5060?)
Message from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Alternative to Digi2: G5 or C5060?)