Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] OT: Darn quest for Image Quality... MF?
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard-lists@imagecraft.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 23:50:43 -0800
References: <000001c3fdc8$c3e88d30$2602a8c0@DenHP> <000001c3fdc8$c3e88d30$2602a8c0@DenHP>

At 07:24 AM 2/28/2004 +0000, Gerry Walden wrote:
>...
>When I had a studio I think it would have been hard to beat my
>Hasselblad for general service work, and second hand prices are deflated
>at the moment as more switch to digital, which begs the question 'why
>not use full frame digital?' like so many are now?
>...

A full frame digital is at least $4000 for the Kodak Pro/SLRn and $8000 for 
the Canon 1Ds, whereas a good MF can be have for $500-$4000?


// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard@imagecraft.com) 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Tom Schofield" <leicaluvr@comcast.net> (RE: [Leica] OT: Darn quest for Image Quality... MF?)
Message from "Tom Schofield" <leicaluvr@comcast.net> (RE: [Leica] OT: Darn quest for Image Quality... MF?)