Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Larry: Interesting that you make the point of a possible additional alliance partner for Leica in the realm of digital camera's. This last weekend I heard a rumor about an old partner working on a DSLR that was in alpha prototype moving to beta. Major concerns were power drain and weight. Could we be hearing about the same thing? Don dorysrus@mindspring.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of LRZeitlin@aol.com Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 7:32 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] Re: Digiluxi In a message dated 2/6/04 11:47:41 AM, Tina writes: << The Digilux is the point and shoot that I carry > everywhere and the Canon is my working camera. >> Leica has used the name "Digilux" on at least four different cameras made by two different manufacturers, Fuji and Panasonic. There are rumors that a third manufacturer is being considered. I have one of the older models, the Digilux Zoom, ne Fuji 1700 Zoom. My son has a Digilux made by Panasonic. It's very confusing. I suggest we refer to Digiluxi by appending a suffix to the name, i.e. Digilux (F) or Digilux 1 (P) or Digilux ? (x). At least until Leica actually starts making its own Digiluxi. Larry Z - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html