Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Chris: Which one do you favor? > I've used the Nikon D100, D2h, Canon 1D and 10D at 1600iso. Jim - http://www.hemenway.com Christopher Williams wrote: > I've used the Nikon D100, D2h, Canon 1D and 10D at 1600iso. No current high > speed film can compare, Leica lens or not. The digital is sharper and less > noisy/grainy. Try printing a 16x20 from Fuji 1600, then compare a 16x20 > print from a D100 on 1600iso. > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "animal" Subject: [Leica] Help requested! i,ve been challenged for a > duel by a Canon owner > > > >>A pro friend of mine who does sports and is good enough to test for both >>Nikon and Canon has challenged me for a low light duel. >>Allthough we have not finalised our test conditions yet what do you >>recommend? >>What can I expect from his state of the art Canon,s in ISO,s and lenses? >>Should i use a Noctilux and slow film or a summicron (90 for the M or 50 > > for > >>my R) on faster film. >>Tripod or hand held?I can really use your help this guy is way beyond me > > in > >>everything photographic. >>Thanks >>simon > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html