Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Help requested! i,ve been challenged for a duel by a Canon owner
From: "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:53:49 -0600
References: <001e01c3e98f$fa35f0a0$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <0bf401c3e992$14e75db0$ce771a41@leaetrg64tja2w> <002f01c3e995$fece07a0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>

I've used the Nikon D100, D2h, Canon 1D and 10D at 1600iso. No current high
speed film can compare, Leica lens or not. The digital is sharper and less
noisy/grainy. Try printing a 16x20 from Fuji 1600, then compare a 16x20
print from a D100 on 1600iso.

Chris

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "animal" Subject: [Leica] Help requested! i,ve been challenged for a
duel by a Canon owner


> A pro friend of mine who does sports and is good enough to test for both
> Nikon and Canon has challenged me for a low light duel.
> Allthough we have not finalised our test conditions yet what do you
> recommend?
> What can I expect from his state of the art Canon,s in ISO,s and lenses?
> Should i use a Noctilux and slow film or a summicron (90 for the M or 50
for
> my R) on faster film.
> Tripod or hand held?I can really use your help this guy is way beyond me
in
> everything photographic.
> Thanks
> simon



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> (Re: [Leica] Help requested! i,ve been challenged for a duel by a Canon owner)
Reply from Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Help requested! i,ve been challenged for a duel by a Canon owner)
In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> ([Leica] AND THE WINNAHS ARE!!!!)
Message from "lea" <lea@whinydogpress.com> (Re: [Leica] AND THE WINNAHS ARE!!!!)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] Help requested! i,ve been challenged for a duel by a Canon owner)