Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] A new definition of inexpensive camera
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 15:30:42 -0800
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040202112704.024bd3e8@mail.infoave.net> <p05100318bc443ac62143@[10.0.1.5]>
Henning Wulff said:
> That's what's starting to make the Epson 4000 look like a cheap printer.<<
Hi Henning and others,
Have any of you seen a 4000 in operation or does anyone use one yet?
We're looking at getting rid of the 2200 if the 4000 runs on a better milage
of inks than the 2200.
ted
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] A new definition of inexpensive camera)
In reply to:
Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] A new definition of inexpensive camera)
Message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] A new definition of inexpensive camera)