Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> animal wrote: > > >>>>Do any of you know of a link or publication that explains at what iso > > > > the > > > >>>>crossover is to 35mm,s film better performance. > >>>>A friend of mine who does pro sport showed me some low light stuff made > >>>>with his top Canon and it was allmost scary. > >> > >> > >>let's see the photos...steve > > I,ll ask him if I can do that. > > simon > > Hi Simon, we have been hearing how digital is better in low > light than film...I think we all would like to see the > photos and the objective testing that supports this > conclusion... > > Steve Well I still believe that it isn,t but will have to proof it this week as I mentioned this morning.Any tips I could use? At 08:47 AM 2/2/2004, you wrote: > > A pro friend of mine who does sports and is good enough to test for both > > Nikon and Canon has challenged me for a low light duel. > > Allthough we have not finalised our test conditions yet what do you > > recommend? > > What can I expect from his state of the art Canon,s in ISO,s and lenses? > > Should i use a Noctilux and slow film or a summicron (90 for the M or > 50 for > > my R) on faster film. > > Tripod or hand held?I can really use your help this guy is way beyond me in > > everything photographic. > > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html