Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital in low light
From: Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:42:53 -0800
References: <152.29b08df6.2d4d03bc@aol.com> <00cd01c3e84d$f159b5e0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <00ca01c3e866$fb720e10$6401a8c0@basecamp2win>

Which is why we pine for a digital M. :-P

Eric
Carlsbad, CA

http://www.jphotog.com

"Clichés are like analogies. At the end of the day, you're just beating 
a dead horse"
On Jan 31, 2004, at 5:59 PM, Jim Laurel wrote:

> Well, I can't speak for other DSLRs, but in my experience, the Canon 
> 1Ds and
> 10D outperform film at every ISO rating.  I am a long-tom Noctilux 
> user, but
> after using these cameras for a while, I must admit that I now reach 
> for the
> DSLRs for shooting low light.  It has to be said, though, that the 
> Noctilux
> still produces a look you cannot get anywhere else.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Teresa299@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Fw: [Large Format] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 ForCampaign Coverage)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] digital in low light)
Message from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)