Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL
From: "SML" <leirex@access4less.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:35:32 -0800
References: <200401022159.i02LxHb21510@perch.serverhost.net> <013001c3d17d$e83dfe80$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <014e01c3d180$fc6cbe70$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <i5fdvvob9un4h2hpc90af3graqcqtk2bqj@4ax.com> <1073348454.5853.98.camel@creo_pc3> <015a01c3d403$6c3c2fe0$7d38030a@sroffice>

Hello,

  I second what was said by Seth.  I have been using several SL/SLMOT along
with the M3 for rangefinder need.  Never did any of them let me down so far
for more than 10 years with NO adjustment.  They simply kept clicking
consistently with the brightest view ever.  Their price has been much
depreciated for their value.

Best Wishes,
David

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Seth Rosner" <sethrosner@direcway.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL


> Feli:
>
> The SL may be bulky and lack bells and whistles. For me, it remains to
this
> day the best SLR made. I bought one three years ago that had just been
> serviced by Don Goldberg who had also calibrated the meter for silver
> batteries. After two weeks' use I sold my R6 and haven't used any other
SLR
> since. As a back-up, I bought a mint SL2 that the seller had had serviced
by
> Don and am thinking of selling it because I don't think I'll ever need it.
> Sherry K tells me the SL is the only SLR camera whose quality and
> construction makes it the equal of the M3, in her opinion the best RF
ever.
>
> I think Doug Herr shares this opinion.
>
> Seth              LaK 9
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Kit McChesney" <kitmc@acmefoto.com> (RE: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: DoF, was: Noctilux-M v. Summilux-R)
Message from Feli di Giorgio <feli@creocollective.com> ([Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL)
Message from Seth Rosner <sethrosner@direcway.com> (Re: [Leica] The amazing Leicaflex SL)