Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Digilux 2 images on Leica-Camera.com
From: Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 18:48:16 +0100
References: <008001c3d2d9$bc2c6c70$6601a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <007f01c3d2e0$ec736a80$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net>

Ted Grant wrote:
> 
> Quite frankly the digi 2 will have to be a "wonder camera" to beat the Canon
> G5 I've been playing with. I realize that's a heretic comment and I maybe
> burned in Leica's hell fires, but sometimes the truth hurts!

Hi Ted,

Actually, having played with the D2 and also looked at the G5 and
Olympus 5060, I think that the D2 is better when it comes to the form
factor: manual focusing and exposure setting is far easier than on the
other cameras. But as I noted earlier, I absolutely hate the electronic
viewfinder. If Leica had provided a proper optical viewfinder and
coupled it to the lens, I would have strongly considered entering the
digital age with this camera, despite the price. As it is, I will stick
with my Ms and CLs.

Nathan

- -- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

Photo site: http://www.wajsmanphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Re: Digilux 2 images on Leica-Camera.com)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Digilux 2 images on Leica-Camera.com)