Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography
From: Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:14:00 -0800
References: <000b01c3bf69$1bc5b940$6501a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <015101c3bf6c$0ee83ce0$3d620b44@pc> <p05111000bbfd56951af6@[192.168.123.137]>

Pornography isn't in the photo's frame, it's between the ears. This 
stuff is pornographic. I would use the Mom test. Would I take Mom to 
the show? :-)

Actually, MY Mom I wouldn't take to a PG-13 movie.

On Dec 10, 2003, at 3:13 PM, Karen Nakamura wrote:

> Did you actually check out the photos?  There's no nudity involved so 
> I'm having difficulty seeing where you see porn. From a pure visual 
> perspective, they're a rip on the milk moustache advertisements.
Eric
Carlsbad, CA

http://www.jphotog.com

"Clichés are like analogies. At the end of the day, you're just beating 
a dead horse"

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)
Message from "www.geocities.com/curtisbliss" <surrealistic@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)
Message from Karen Nakamura <mail@gpsy.com> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)