Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/12/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced
From: Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:56:50 -0500
References: <3FCC529D.3EB55402@rabinergroup.com> <3.0.6.32.20031202063605.007d22e0@POP6.sympatico.ca> <20031202122919.GA13756@panix.com> <825CAE72-24D6-11D8-A34C-000A958F513A@jphotog.com> <72C75EC7-24DA-11D8-8D4F-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>
yes, however, with the tiny sensor size, f2 is not capable of a shallow
depth-of-field (it's like f8 on a 35mm camera). if they made an
f0.5 digi-summicron, or an f0.25 digi-noctilux) then sensor size (diffraction
issues aside) would not be such an issue.
- -rei
On Dec 2, 2003, at 7:47 AM, Eric Welch wrote:
>Isn't the end result what counts? Numbers like this are irrelevant to
>actual image quality. It's how the lens images. And that being said, I
>find the camera pretty interesting, but the fact that it stops at ISO
>400 is really bad...
- --
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> ([Leica] The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
Message from Dan C <leicaman@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)
Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] The LEICA DIGILUX 2 is announced)