Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: Chomsky Re: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd)
From: "Slobodan Dimitrov" <s.dimitrov@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:11:32 -0800
 
A 'red thread'! Can you define the term? 
I'm only asking for clarity's sake.
Slobodan Dimitrov


- ----------
>From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: RE: Chomsky Re: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd)
>Date: Fri, Nov 28, 2003, 9:19 AM

>
> There seems to be a red thread running through his work ... even the
> academic work requires one to think more critically about previously
> accepted truths.
>
> I'll have to check out some of his other works ... thanks.
>
> Daniel
>
> 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> (Re: Chomsky Re: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd))
Reply from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: Chomsky Re: [Leica] XXX of the YYY? WAS (something else) (fwd))