Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica Digilux 2
From: Sonny Carter <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:59:58 -0800
References: <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBCEEMDDAA.phong@doan-ltd.com> <BBEABBE7.FE4%quincyogwin@bellnet.ca>

Hello Quincy,

If you read the stuff, it is an electronic viewfinder. What you see on
the front of the camera is the AF sensor.

In my experience, a suitable VF.  Making the camera more an slr than
an RF.

SonC






Wednesday, November 26, 2003, 5:21:59 PM, you wrote:



QO> On 11/26/03 9:36 AM, "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com> wrote:

>> I am hoping for a bright viewfinder, low shutter lag.

QO> Hummm, judging by the size of the VF entry window, what are the chances of
QO> that ? Still, it might be bright enough to use...but I'll bet you dollars to
QO> donuts it's going to be winky-dinky small with poor eye relief and
QO> distortion akin to looking through a mason jar sideways. I mean it's being
QO> made by a consumer electronics company. Ever look through the window of a
QO> toaster oven ?

QO> Hello...earth to Solms, earth to Solms...why, why, WHY can't you make a
QO> digital camera with a decent (read: LARGE AND BRIGHT) RF/VF with parallax
QO> correction. 

QO> Hell, farm it out to Konica or Contax fer christsakes.

QO> -=-
QO> Quincy


QO> --
QO> To unsubscribe, see
QO> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html



- -- 
Best regards,
 Sonny                            mailto:sonc@sonc.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Phong <phong@doan-ltd.com> (RE: [Leica] Re: Leica Digilux 2)
Message from Quincy Ogwin <quincyogwin@bellnet.ca> ([Leica] Re: Leica Digilux 2)