Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] some new snaps, a propos
From: Sander van Hulsenbeek <alex@vanhulsenbeek.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:00:15 +0100
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20031108115025.02a63010@mail.infoave.net>

What will be next? The Anti Wide Angle Act? The Wide Angle Police, a.k.a.
WAPs?

Sander
Amsterdam
Holland

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tina Manley" <images@InfoAve.Net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] some new snaps, a propos


> At 10:11 AM 11/8/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >Beware of what you read and see from that conflict. Nothing is as simple
> >as it seems.
> >
> >Emanuel Lowi
> >Montreal
>
> A different slant on a recent news photograph:
>
>
http://www.honestreporting.com/articles/critiques/Something_Fishy_at_AFP.asp
>
> Using a wide angle lens is distorting the truth?
>
> Tina
>
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] some new snaps, a propos)