Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Don's PAW43 Princess's or Karen made me do it
From: Karen Nakamura <mail@gpsy.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 22:01:53 -0600
References: <000001c3a0dd$3ab2f890$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4>

>Perhaps a month ago Karen posted some images made with a 50's Canon F1.4
>LTM lens that had a very pleasant look to them.  So when Central in
>Chicago had two virtually mint ones available you know what went home
>with me.  Last week I posted an image where I was trying to flare the
>lens to not much effect.  This week I was in line behind this Princess
>playing with her father.  The shadow side was very dim, maybe 1/8 at
>F1.4 at ISO 100, with full sunshine outside.  While the negatives show
>some veiling glare, the lens performed very well in a pretty demanding
>situation.

Great photo! A nice journalistic touch. I'm wondering though why your 
lens is so soft. My lens doesn't experience any of that softness. 
Part of it could be motion blur, though, I guess.

Karen


- -- 
Karen Nakamura
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> ([Leica] Don's PAW43 Princess's or Karen made me do it)