Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] California bashing - was Fires
From: "Jeffery Smith" <jls@runbox.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:43:50 -0600

Modeling on a computer, but testing?

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Barney Quinn
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:55 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] California bashing - was Fires




Jeffery Smith wrote:

> Or let them be vaccinated with a substance tested by an IBM computer.

I'd go a little bit easy here. There are computers and there are computers.
It is a very, very long way from the world of PC's and Mac boxes to that of
heavy metal high performance super computing. A lot of organic and
bio-chemistry comes down to stereo-chemistry, meaning how complex molecules
react and interact in a real, three dimensional world. Modern super
computers can do some very incredible things when it comes to modeling and
simulating things. We are in no way talking Bill Gates, the blue screen of
death, desktops and OSX and Steve Jobs here. Scientific computing is done by
very different people with very different training and priorities than
business computing types. I don't think that I would allow myself to be
vaccinated with a compound which had never been tested or validated in a
living system, but I have no objection to one which had as much of the
preliminaty work as possible done using modern modeling techniques.

Barney

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html