Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?
From: Jerry Lehrer <>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 13:43:37 -0700
References: <004c01c395ab$41a75f20$0264a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <000a01c395b6$c4210270$0e01000a@basecamp2win>


OK now.  Just when will the sky fall?  Gimme a timetable, Chicken Little.

Thanks in advance,

Jim Laurel wrote:

> Phew, finally a response from the LUGs own digital acolyte.  I was worried
> something happened to you when took more than a 24 hours to respond, B.D.!
> All in fun...  ;-)
> --Jim
> B. D. Colen wrote:
> > In response to Dante's anti-digital diatribe -
> >
> > Sorry, Dante, but this is precisely what you've labled it - a rant, and
> > like most rants it is far more a rhetorical exercise than a rational
> > discussion of an important topic.
> --
> To unsubscribe, see

- --
To unsubscribe, see

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <> (RE: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)
Message from "Jim Laurel" <> (Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)