Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Frank: I wouldn't count on this in every situation, some issuers/banks will not, and don't have to comply... my experience. This is why I will not use or accept PayPal. Anyone who buys from me and who wants the item sent quickly, has to send me a US Postal money order. I will then send the item the day after I receive that USPS MO. Otherwise they wait for their check or "non-sched" MO to clear. I only send USPS MOs for things that I buy on ebay, unless other payment methods are negotiated before I bid. It doesn't take a whole lot of effort to get a USPS MO, they even accept debit cards... I don't have to go to my bank first to get cash for the MO. > I don;t see > what grounds the Issuer would have to not return the funds. Because the ebay seller is not the issuer's customer, PayPal is their customer. Jim - http://www.hemenway.com Frank Filippone wrote: > Yes. the issuer for Visa...... My experience was as listed...... The > goods were not delivered, therefore payment was returned to me. I don;t see > what grounds the Issuer would have to not return the funds. No goods = no > $$$. Seems pretty simple to me. The fact that Paypal was in the middle was > not an issue and I do not see why it would be an issue. Of course, I am > seeing this from one side.... > > In the long run, if there is a problem, Paypal would take the funds from the > seller's account. Something easily done since they have CC numbers, bank > account numbers, etc. on file. It would rarely come out of their pocket and > so they should try to be neutral. No merchandise = no $$$. > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html