Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
At 9:42 PM -0700 9/22/03, Richard F. Man wrote:
>At 09:09 PM 9/22/2003 -0700, Henning Wulff wrote:
>>>No need to get the new 90 if the size is no inducement, or if you
>>>carry a 90 Summicron anyways. I'm sure the 90AA would perform
>>>adequately at f/4 and smaller at closer distances.
>>
>>Actually, if the distance between the front and rear nodal points
>>on the lenses are different, there will be some difference and your
>>focossing point might be different.
>>....
>
>Wellllll, in the case that IF it works with other 90, such as the
>90AA, I may actually be interested in the eyes. I was carrying an M7
>w/ 35 and an OM-4T w/ 90 Macro on couple trips and one of the
>reasons was the macro focusing.
There is an extremely good chance that the extension ring/goggles
will work with other 90's, and in that case I'm interested as well. I
don't always need 1:1 macro capability, but often I would appreciate
1:4 capability, especially with TTL flash.
- --
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html