Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Check the archives Greg - I was totally up front about my new connection with Olympus. Given how I feel about conflicts of interest I would hardly try to hide any conflict of my own. Best, B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 3:50 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Was B.D's Ties to Olympus? Now What Full and Complete Disclosure?? B.D. I do not seem to have received the post to the Lug you refer to below in response to Don's question. (Perhaps due to an internet glich?) Remembering your posts some time back when Tina posted regarding her thoughts about, and work with, her Leica Digilux and thus knowing your strong feelings on this issue (complete, total, unambiguous disclosure) can you refer me to your Thursday post? Regards, Greg > Don Dory thoughtfully requested (in part)of B.D. What (if any) Were > His Ties to Olympus? > > > B.D., > Are you one of the official Beta testers for the E1? It was my > understanding that this camera would not be released for general > consumption until much later this month or early October. Also, I can > not find the camera for sale at the large on line dealers. > > > Don > And B.D. Replied to Don and the Group(in part) as Follows: > As I stated yesterday, I am one of a group of about photographers > who'sdigital work Olympus is supporting with equipment. I have a > contractwith Olympus. So, as I said, judge what I say with that in > mind - but > keep in mind I have never been accused of pulling punches about > anything, and am not about to begin now. > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html