Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/09/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: A second M body? Now 3rd M body
From: "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:43:04 -0500
References: <Law15-F65vqFjLmIJOw00046392@hotmail.com> <20030908110128.GB14196@panix.com>
Third M body useful? Hella yes! M6, M2, M3
Chris
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Rei Shinozuka" Subject: Re: [Leica] A second M body?
> i think a second M body is mandatory. the question is: is a third M
> body & lens useful? I think: yes!!
>
> -rei
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: A second M body? Now 3rd M body)
In reply to:
Message from "jan schuller" <janschuller@hotmail.com> ([Leica] A second M body?)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] A second M body?)