Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] A second M body?
From: Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:01:28 -0400
References: <Law15-F65vqFjLmIJOw00046392@hotmail.com>

i think a second M body is mandatory.  the question is: is a third M 
body & lens useful?  I think: yes!!

- -rei

On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:35:31AM +0200, jan schuller wrote:
> Is a second M body & lens useful?
> I think: Yes
> http://www.unizh.ch/biostat/People/schuller/vanity1.html
> 
> Jan

- -- 
Rei Shinozuka shino@panix.com
Ridgewood, New Jersey

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> ([Leica] Re: A second M body? Now 3rd M body)
In reply to: Message from "jan schuller" <janschuller@hotmail.com> ([Leica] A second M body?)