Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] re aim
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:32:03 -0700
References: <70.313953d9.2c78dbd8@aol.com> <000001c369ab$786adfe0$488cfea9@aoldsl.net> <007701c3699e$33bed700$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>

Simon

Boy!  Do you have the wrong group here!!

Jerry

animal wrote:

> 22 weapons loadout still needs to be fixed.  The current
> configuration will not load weapons correctly.  I would suggest the
> following:
>
> HP1: F-22 side - 1 AIM-9M, 1 AIM-9X (it cannot carry 2 missiles here)
> HP2: F-22 outboard - 1 GBU-32, 1 GBU-35, 1 GBU-38, 2 AIM-120
> HP3: F-22 inboard - 1 AIM-120C
> HP4: F-22 inboard - 1 AIM-120C
> HP5: F-22 outboard - 1 GBU-32, 1 GBU-35, 1 GBU-38, 2 AIM-120
> HP6: F-22 side - 1 AIM-9M, 1 AIM-9X (it cannot carry 2 missiles here)
>
> F-18 racks still not assigned
>
> EF-2000 loadout missing a few hardpoints
>
> B-52H should only carry up to 9 bombs on each wing.  The capability
> for 12 went out when the G and H models were upgraded for additional
> conventional munitions support.  They now use the HSAB (9-weapon
> rack) and can no longer use the Hound Dog pylon with 2 MER's.
>
> AIM-120C still not updated/working
>
> EF-2000 map icon/plane assignment icon not working
>
> KC-10/135 new models still not installed
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from LRZeitlin@aol.com ([Leica] Digilux?)
Message from "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] Digilux?)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] re aim)